Nour (Light) Party Views
Sheikh Hamdī Abd
al-Fattāh
![]() |
| First open elections in decades or longer |
Salafi Nour Party platform is moderate. It is
comprehensive and without fanaticism toward anyone. Among its priorities is the
call to implement sharī‘ah law, but it emphasizes to do this gradually.
If
you compare Egypt, with all its civilization and history, Jordan, Turkey, and
Malaysia all have higher tourist incomes. This is because we rely on luxury
tourism only. We can boost conference tourism, which not only can bring more
money that luxury tourism, it also profits the nation scientifically as doctors
and professors bring knowledge in addition to money spent on airfare, hotels,
clubs, and general expenses. There is also medical tourism. We should build
world-class hospitals that will draw the majority of medical travelers from the
Gulf and from Africa.
We
will also promote luxury tourism, but only that which is religiously
legitimate. It is not necessary to mix the sexes on the beach. We have many
unmarried young men. When they view these mixed settings the result can be one
of sin. What is the problem with establishing some family-only or single-sex
chalets, where you can enjoy yourself freely without temptation? Turkey has
done this, for example. Should there not be freedom for this, is this not
respect for freedom? You might say we should be open-minded, but I reply I
don’t want anyone to see my wife. So as you call for freedom for the other, I
also call for the freedom to keep my wife from being seen. But are we
forgetting about the tourists from the Gulf when we concentrate on Europe? Gulf
countries have more tourists, and Egypt is the closest country to them. Right
now, they are going to Turkey.
Yes,
Muslim-Christian relations here in the village are very strong. It is
friendship, not just greeting each other in the streets. If there are problems,
even between two Christians, we come to the church to help solve them. Every
day we sit to solve problems between Muslims. Often we sit to solve problems
between Christians. But what happens is when there is a problem between a
Muslim and a Christian the media twists the issue somewhat to become a
religious matter. They take refuge in religious chauvinism and turn it from a
personal struggle into a religious one. There are occasions where a Muslim boy
and girl will make an improper relationship, and the same with Christians. But
if it happens between religions, we must treat it with reason and wisdom in the
same manner we would otherwise. We don’t accept any religious chauvinism in
either direction.
![]() |
| Long lines for hours to vote in November |
Today,
many Copts feel that jiziah is a form of contempt or shame. But does he not pay
taxes? Fine, we will cancel the word jiziah, and call it taxes. We’ll say, ‘Pay
your taxes, and what will you get in return? No one will attack you in your
worship, or your doctrine, or your homes, or your persons, or your money, or
your honor. You will have complete security, and have your protection
guaranteed. If you don’t want to enter the army, you won’t have to.’ the
perspective of Muslims toward Christians if the sharī‘ah is implemented. We
will treat them with righteousness, respect, friendship, and justice. In terms
of rights, everyone will be the same. There will be no difference between a
Muslim and a Christian. In terms of their family affairs – marriage, divorce,
inheritance – we will not apply sharī‘ah here but they can judge themselves.
They will have all rights.
The
prophet said, ‘What is for them is for us,’ which means, if I can take salary,
or gain positions, or have houses, or …, in everything that has to do with
putting together a government there is no difference between Muslim or
Christian. Even the high positions in
government, and there will be equivalence in their salaries as
well. As long as they don’t kill me, or raise a weapon against me, or attack
me, I am obliged to protect them and give security to them and their houses of
worship as well. I represent the district, not just those who vote for me. This
is democracy, and it is also sharī‘ah. I will treat the Christian like the
Muslim, and in fact be sure to be responsible for them. Of Christians it says,
‘You will find the nearest of them in affection to the believers those who say,
"We are Christians."’ (Quran 5:82)
But
the most difficult religion, which hates all of humanity, is that of the Jews.
They hate Christianity also. In Palestine, do they make any difference between
Muslim and Christian? No, they will kill them both. So the Jewish religion has
the most hate for humanity, but as for Christianity, there is friendship,
‘because among them are priests and monks and because they are not arrogant’
(continuing verse above).
![]() |
| Reaction to decades of corruption and violence in 2011. |
Is
democracy the rule of the people by the people? No, for us ruling is only for
God. as concerns the roots of sharī‘ah, all are in agreement. new interpretations, consistent with the modern era has to do with the details, not with the
roots. We reject a religious state. Why? A religious state is one where the
ruler states that what he decides is from God. No. We want a civil state which
is ruled by sharī‘ah. If the ruler makes an error we declare his error, and if
he is correct, we say thank you and accept it.
But
if a matter transgresses the will of the majority, we will accept it. But we
respect freedom in everything except that which is against the established principles
of religion. And we respect all minorities. The religious state, as the media
makes out that we believe in, is the equivalent of Europe in the Middle Ages
where the church ruled by God’s law and there was no room for discussion. The
church ruled as if it was in the place of God. We say we are not in the place
of God on earth. No, we present the law of God, and we implement the law of
God, but not with haughtiness or pride.
Must a woman cover with the hijāb,
the niqāb, or is
she free to wear what she wants? Nothing religious will be imposed
on anyone. We will advise only, and the one who refuses is free. You
are a Christian, and you will raise your children to be Christian. I, likewise,
am a Muslim and do the same. But if we take someone like the liberal ‘Amr
Hamzāwī, who says I will let my children choose their faith… Do the traditions
of Egypt allow someone to do this? There
must be preservation of the identity of Egypt. You are an American and you have
your customs, but is it acceptable to implement your customs on the people of
Egypt?
Note From Steve: Words of intention in
politics are not always the same as resulting actions. Things are
usually more complex than news media outlets reports them to be. (The
Salafi are considered to be more conservatively Islamic than the Muslim
Brotherhood who won the majority of parliament seats.) Many Egyptian
Christians (Copts) are far from comforted by the election results.



No comments:
Post a Comment